![]() ![]() "It's time for the FDA to lean into the discussion and, have a solid review, evaluate all the available science," he says, so the agency can provide the guidance that food companies need. "It's FDA's call to make," Gindlesperger says. In a letter to the FDA, the organization said that California was "out of its depths when it comes to national food safety standards." He says the FDA should use its regulatory authority to settle the issue of whether red 3 can continue to be used in food. Lurie says he thinks the action in California will "make it more likely that they grant our petition." His group, joined by other consumer advocacy groups including Public Interest Research Group and Consumer Federation of America, filed a petition last October with the FDA to ban the use of red No. ![]() Peter Lurie, president and executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "I think the passage of the bill in California creates undeniable pressure on the FDA," says Dr. 3, and public health advocates are pushing to remove the dye from the food supply nationwide. 3, after California passed a law to ban it last week.Ĭalifornia became the first state to ban four food additives, including red No. There's new pressure on the Food and Drug Administration to take action on the synthetic food coloring, red No. Synthetic food dyes like this one have been linked with behavioral issues in kids. Red dye 3 is found in many products including cake and cookie decorations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |